Enforcing Restraint: Collective Intervention in Internal Conflicts
Jeffrey Clark, James B. Steinberg, Formerly Research Fellow Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies Jeffrey Clark, Ph.D., Max M. Kampelman, Jane E. Stromseth, Domingo E. Acevedo, David Wippman, Steven R. Ratner, Tom Farer
Council on Foreign Relations, 1993 - Law - 403 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
accept action adopted affairs African agreed agreement allied American areas arms assistance attack August authority Bosnia called Cambodia cease-fire Charter civil civilian collective concern consent constitutional continued crisis December decision democracy democratic early ECOMOG economic economic sanctions ECOWAS effective efforts elections embargo emergency enforcement established example force foreign former groups Haiti Haitian human rights humanitarian independence initial institutions interests internal conflicts international community International Law intervention involvement Iraq Iraqi issues January June Kurdish Kurds leaders least Liberia limited March means measures Meeting military normative November October operation organizations parties peace peacekeeping political population President principle problem protect question refugees regional relief remains Report representative Republic resolution respect response role sanctions secretary-general Security Council situation Somalia territory threat tion troops United United Nations violations Washington Post World York Yugoslavia
Page 9 - No State or group of States has the right to intervene, directly or indirectly, for any reason whatever, in the internal or external affairs of any other State. The foregoing principle prohibits not only armed force but also any other form of interference or attempted threat against the personality of the State or against its political, economic and cultural elements.
Page 310 - Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to maintain international peace and security.
Page 300 - The Security Council may decide what measures not involving the use of armed force are to be employed to give effect to its decisions, and it may call upon the Members of the United Nations to apply such measures. These may include complete or partial interruption of economic relations and of rail, sea, air, postal, telegraphic, radio, and other means of communication, and the severance of diplomatic relations.
Page 365 - Any Contracting Party may call upon the competent organs of the United Nations to take such action under the Charter of the United Nations as they consider appropriate for the prevention and suppression of acts of genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in article III.
Page 312 - Questions of Interpretation and Application of the 1971 Montreal Convention arising from the Aerial Incident at Lockerbie (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v.
Page 151 - No State may use or encourage the use of coercive measures of an economic or political character in order to force the sovereign will of another State and obtain from it advantages of any kind.
Page 9 - Nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state or shall require the Members to submit such matters to settlement under the present Charter; but this principle shall not prejudice the application of enforcement measures under Chapter VII.
Page 342 - All Members of the United Nations, in order to contribute to the maintenance of international peace and security, undertake to make available to the Security Council, on its call and in accordance with a special agreement or agreements, armed forces, assistance, and facilities, including rights of passage, necessary for the purpose of maintaining international peace and security.
Page 58 - The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all; and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective...