Vandals in the Stacks?: A Response to Nicholson Baker's Assault on Libraries
Libraries and archives have violated their public trust, argues Nicholson Baker in his controversial book DEGREESIDouble Fold DEGREESR, by destroying traditional books, newspapers, and other paper-based collections. Baker's powerful and persuasive book is wrong and misleading, and Cox critiques it point by point, questioning his research, his assumptions, and his arguments about why and how newspapers, books, and other collections are selected and maintained.
DEGREESIDouble Fold DEGREESR, which reads like a history of libraries and archives, is not a history at all, but a journalistic account that is often based on fanciful and far-flung assertions and weak data. The present book provides an opportunity to understand how libraries and archives view their societal mandate, the nature of their preservation and documentary functions, and the complex choices and decisions that librarians and archivists face. Libraries and archives are not simple warehouses for the storage of objects to be occasionally called upon by a scholar, but they play vital roles in determining and shaping a society's knowledge and documentation.
Try this search over all volumes: 2d Cir
Results 1-0 of 0
What people are saying - Write a review
LibraryThing ReviewUser Review - Othemts - LibraryThing
Richard Cox writes a valiant response to Nicholson Baker’s Double Fold, citing heavily from the previous work to show the flaws in Baker’s critique and attempt to set the record straight from the ... Read full review
Life Imitates Art?
The Big Picture and Bakers World
9 other sections not shown