Presidential Debates : The Challenge of Creating an Informed Electorate: The Challenge of Creating an Informed Electorate
The Annenberg School for Communication University of Pennsylvania Kathleen Hall Jamieson Dean, Department of Speech Baruch College David S. Birdsell Assistant Professor, City University of New York
Oxford University Press, USA, Oct 13, 1988 - Campaign debates - 276 pages
Presidential debates have had mixed reviews. Advocates praise debates as a way of making issues more central to the campaign. Others criticize them as little more than joint press conferences. How important are these debates? Do they really test knowledge and vision? Do they sort good ideas from bad, or reveal important character traits and habits of mind? In short, do they provide voters with what they need to know to choose a president? To address these questions, the authors place contemporary debates in their cultural and historical context, tracing their origins and development in the American political tradition, from the eighteenth century to the present. Although the Kennedy-Nixon TV confrontations were an historical first, debate was an element of American electoral politics by 1788 and a staple of policy deliberation throughout the colonial period. Indeed, much of the confusion over the value of debates stems in part from the long tradition of political debating in America. Thus, to make the most productive use of debate in modern presidential politics, the authors argue, we must respond to the history of this tradition. The book concludes with recommendations to preserve the best elements of traditional debate while adapting to the requirements of the broadcast age. The reforms they advocate include: substantive debates between major party representatives between elections; alternative formats; use of visual aids in debates; follow-up press conferences; a focus on fewer issues and increased experimentation in the primaries. Presidential debates provide voters with a rare opportunity to evaluate political reasoning on complex issues. In suggesting ways to make presidential debates even more effective, this thought-provoking volume makes an important contribution to America's political future.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Characteristics of Prebroadcast Debates in America
The Contributions of American Debate 17701920
The Limitations of American Debate 17701920
The Impact of Broadcasting on Debates
The Power of Broadcast Debates
The Problems of Broadcast Debates
The Promise of Debates
Other editions - View all
abolitionists Adams advocates American answer argued arguments asked attack attention audience bates broadcast campaign Carter character citizens claim clash Congress Constitution contest Convention coverage debate form debate of 1976 debate of i960 decision Democratic Dewey differences discussion Dole Douglas election debates electorate favor federal Ford format Gary Hart Geraldine Ferraro i960 debates Ibid important invite issues Jackson Jefferson Jimmy Carter John Quincy Adams Kennedy League Lincoln Lincoln-Douglas Lincoln-Douglas debates ment Michael Dukakis moderator Mondale Murrow nineteenth century Nixon nominee opponents participants partisan petition political debate positions presidential candidates presidential debates press conference primary debates questions radio TV& radio Reagan reporters Republican response revealed rhetoric Richard Nixon Ronald Reagan Senator slave slavery Social Security speaker speeches Stassen statement Stephen Douglas substance surrogates television Thomas Jefferson tion topics viewers vote voters Walter Mondale Webster Webster-Hayne debate York
The Therapeutic State: Justifying Government at Century's End
James L. Nolan Jr.
No preview available - 1998
All Book Search results »
News Verdicts, the Debates, and Presidential Campaigns
Snippet view - 1991