Transportation Needs and Funding Alternatives: A SurveyJim Self Institute on the Future, Strom Thurmond Institute of Government and Public Affairs, Clemson University, 2001 - Infrastructure (Economics) - 114 pages |
From inside the book
20 pages matching percent unfavorable responses in this book
Where's the rest of this book?
Results 1-3 of 20
Common terms and phrases
$8 per month Clemson University Coastal counties Coastal Midland Upstate Commuter Rail Commuter Rail Service Conditions of South Congestion/Traffic Flow County Size 60.0 David Sparks DK/NA/Ref Educational Attainment Favorable Ratings favorable responses ranged fuel taxes fund expenditures Fund Transportation Funding for Highway funding for safety Geographic Region 60.0 high speed rail highway beautification Highway Impact Fees Highway Maintenance income taxes Increased Funding Inter-City Rail Interstate 85 Level of Educational Mean Ratings mean response metro/inner city buses Midland Upstate Figure Option by Level Pedestrian Walkways percent of respondents percent unfavorable responses Percentage of Favorable population property taxes Ratings for Increased Ratings of South responses were given road maintenance Roads and Highways Rural counties Rural residents Safety Improvements sales tax significantly higher Significantly increase funding Significantly reduce funding South Carolina Roads Strom Thurmond Taxes to Fund Total Coastal Midland Total Urban Transportation by County Transportation by Geographic transportation needs Transportation Programs Urban residents