Security has become a defining feature of contemporary public discourse, permeating the so-called 'war on terror', problems of everyday crime and disorder, the reconstruction of 'weak' or 'failed' states and the dramatic renaissance of the private security industry. But what does it mean for individuals to be secure, and what is the relationship between security and the practices of the modern state? In this timely and important book, Ian Loader and Neil Walker outline and defend the view that security remains a valuable public good. They argue that the state is indispensable to the task of fostering and sustaining liveable political communities in the contemporary world and thus pivotal to the project of civilizing security. This is a major contribution by two leading scholars in the field and will be of interest to anyone wishing to deepen their understanding of one the most significant and pressing issues of our times.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
actors argue argument authoritarian authority basic beneﬁts Bigo capacity chapter citizens civil society civilizing security claims collective concerns conﬂict constitutive consumerism context crime critical security studies critique cultural deﬁned deﬁnition demands democracy democratic difﬁcult dimension economic effect European Union Europol ﬁeld ﬁnal ﬁnd ﬁrst place ﬂow forms freedom function global public governance human ical idea identiﬁcation individual inﬂuence insecurity institutional instrumental interests Johnston and Shearing justice liberal liberty liberty lobby Loader means meddling modern mutual negative freedom neo-liberal Newburn non-excludable non-state one’s ontological security ordering dimensions particular pluralism police ofﬁcers police power policing and security political community priority problems protection public provision question reasons reﬂect regimes regulatory rity role scepticism secu securitizing security practice seek sense Shearing and Wood signiﬁcant social imaginary solidarity sovereign speciﬁc state’s sufﬁciently tasks tends terror threat tion war on terror