Philosophos: Plato's Missing Dialogue
Plato famously promised to complement the Sophist and the Statesman with another work on a third sort of expert, the philosopher—but we do not have this final dialogue. Mary Louise Gill argues that Plato promised the Philosopher, but did not write it, in order to stimulate his audience and encourage his readers to work out, for themselves, the portrait it would have contained. The Sophist and Statesman are themselves members of a larger series starting with the Theaetetus, Plato's investigation of knowledge, and the whole series relies on the Parmenides, the second part of which presents a philosophical exercise, introduced as the first step in a larger philosophical program. Gill contends that the dialogues leading up to the missing Philosopher, though they reach some substantive conclusions, are philosophical exercises of various sorts designed to train students in dialectic, the philosopher's method; and that a second version of the Parmenides exercise, closely patterned on it, spans parts of the Theaetetus and Sophist and brings the philosopher into view. This is the exercise about being, the subject-matter studied by Plato's philosopher. Plato hides the pieces of the puzzle and its solution in plain sight, forcing his students (and modern readers) to dig out the pieces and reconstruct the project. Gill reveals how, in finding the philosopher through the exercise, the student becomes a philosopher by mastering his methods. She shows that the target of Plato's exercise is internally related to its pedagogical purpose.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
1 Forms in Question
2 A Philosophical Exercise
3 The Contest between Heraclitus and Parmenides
4 Knowledge as Expertise
5 Appearances of the Sophist
6 Refining the Statesman
Other editions - View all
Aporia appears argues Aristotle Aristotle’s auto kath beautiful Bostock Burnyeat called capacity categorial change and rest Chapter claim Cornford 1935a Deduction define definition dialogue dichotomous division discussion distinct distinguish dunamis earlier Eleatic entity exercise expertise explain F-ness Final Argument Frede G. E. L. Owen genus Gill Gods and Giants grasp hauto henad Heraclitean Heraclitus immanent character interpretation knowledge letters monads nature negation not-being not-F object opposite Owen Oxford Oxford Classical Texts Parmenides partake participation perceive perception Phaedo Phaedrus Philebus philosopher philosopher’s Phronesis Plato positive hypothesis proposal pros heauto Protagoras puzzle regress relation Repr scholars separate Simmias Socrates someone Sophist and Statesman sort soul sound statecraft statement Stranger Theaetetus Theodorus theory of forms Theuth things Third Man Argument Timaeus true judgment University Press upcoming weaving whole Young Socrates Zeno