What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Abbott Alexander H Amasa Cobb authority Benjamin F bonds Brevet Buckalew Burt Van Horn Butler Cattell Charles citizens civil Clarke coin color command Conkling Constitution contract convention Corbett court Cragin Davis debt declared disagreed to—yeas district Dixon dollars Drake duties election execution Ferry Fessenden fifth military district follow George Georgia gold Government habeas corpus Henry hold office House Hulburd James John John Trimble Jones Joseph judge judgment July Justice Kellogg legislation legislature March ment military Morgan Morrill of Maine Morrill of Vermont Morton nays Nays—Messrs party Patterson payment persons plaintiff in error Pomeroy President question Ramsey ratified rebellion Republican resolution right to hold Robertson Ross Samuel Saulsbury Sawyer Senate Sherman Sidney Clarke Smith statute Stewart Texas Thayer thereof Thomas tion Trumbull Union United States notes Vickers Virginia vote voters Warner Washburn Willey William Wilson XlVth amendment Yeas—Messrs
Page 435 - That the power to tax involves the power to destroy ; that the power to destroy may defeat and render useless the power to create ; that there is a plain repugnance in conferring on one government a power to control the constitutional measures of another, which other, with respect to those very measures, is declared to be supreme over that which exerts the control, are propositions not to be denied.
Page 464 - Why does a judge swear to discharge his duties agreeably to the constitution of the United States if that constitution forms no rule for his government — if it is closed upon him, and cannot be inspected by him? If such be the real state of things, this is worse than solemn mockery. To prescribe or to take this oath becomes equally a crime.
Page 404 - Resolved by the senate and house of representatives of the United States of America in congress assembled (two-thirds of both houses concurring,) That the following article be proposed to the legislatures of the several states as an amendment to the constitution of the United States...
Page 461 - ... or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But congress may, by a vote of two thirds of each house, remove such disability.
Page 452 - Under this article of the constitution it rests with congress to decide what government is the established one in a State. For as the United States guarantee to each State a republican government, congress must necessarily decide what government is established in the State before it can determine whether it is republican or not.
Page 431 - Laws shall be made to exclude from office, serving on juries, and from the right of suffrage, those who shall hereafter be convicted of bribery, perjury, forgery, or other high crimes. The privilege of free suffrage shall be supported by laws regulating elections, and prohibiting, under adequate penalties, all undue influence thereon, from power, bribery, tumult, or other improper practice.
Page 450 - It is difficult to convey the idea of indissoluble unity more clearly than by these words. What can be indissoluble if a perpetual Union, made more perfect, is not...
Page 435 - ... That the power to tax involves the power to destroy: that the power to destroy may defeat and render useless the power to create; that there is a plain repugnance in conferring on one government a power to control the constitutional measures of another, which other, with respect to those very means, is declared to be supreme over that which exerts the control are propositions not to be denied.
Page 476 - That it shall be the duty of each officer assigned as aforesaid, to protect all persons in their rights of person and property, to suppress insurrection, disorder, and violence, and to punish, or cause to be punished, all disturbers of the public peace and criminals...
Page 464 - The judicial power of the United States is extended to all cases arising under the Constitution. Could it be the intention of those who gave this power, to say that in using it the Constitution should not be looked into ? That a case arising under the Constitution should be decided without examining the instrument under which it arises ? This is too extravagant to be maintained.