A Dictionary of Psychological Medicine: Giving the Definition, Etymology and Synonyms of the Terms Used in Medical Psychology with the Symptoms, Treatment, and Pathology of Insanity and the Law of Lunacy in Great Britain and Ireland, Volume 1
Daniel Hack Tuke
J. & A. Churchill, 1892 - Mental health laws - 1477 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
action activity acute affection alcohol aphasia appear asylum attack attention bath become blood body brain catalepsy cause cent centres cerebellum cerebral cerebrum changes character chorea chronic condition consciousness convolution convulsions criminal defect delirium tremens delusions dementia depression dipsomania double form emotional epilepsy epileptic examination excitement existence exophthalmic fact feeling fever folie form of insanity frequently functions goitre hallucinations Hospital hysteria hysterical ideas idiocy impulse insanity insanity of double jury lesion less Lord lucid interval Lunacy lunatic madness mania melan melancholia ment mental derangement mental disease mental disorder mind monomania moral morbid motor movements muscles nature nerve nervous system ness normal observed occur organic pain paralysis patient period person physician pia mater present prisoner radicle recognised regard relation result sane sanity sensation sense sensory sion specific gravity speech symptoms synonym syphilis term tion tissue treatment words
Page 312 - ... to establish a defence on the ground of insanity, it must be clearly proved that, at the time of the committing of the act, the party accused was labouring under such a defect of reason, from disease of the mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing; or, if he did know it, that he did not know he was doing what was wrong.
Page 311 - If the accused was conscious that the act was one which he ought not to do, and if that act was at the same time contrary to the law of the land, he is punishable...
Page 480 - A witness is allowed to refresh his memory respecting a fact, by anything written by himself, or under his direction, at the time when the fact occurred, or immediately thereafter, or at any other time when the fact was fresh in his memory, and he knew that the same was correctly stated in the writing.
Page 330 - A lunatic or non compos mentis, is one who hath had understanding, but by disease, grief, or other accident, hath lost the use of his reason.
Page 310 - What are the proper questions to be submitted to the jury, where a person alleged to be afflicted with insane delusion respecting one or more particular subjects or persons is charged with the commission of a crime (murder, for example), and insanity is set up as a defence?" And thirdly: "In what terms ought the question to be left to the jury as to the prisoner's state of mind at the time when the act was committed?
Page 311 - ... asked his opinion in the terms above stated, because each of those questions involves the determination of the truth of the facts deposed to, which it is for the jury to decide, and the questions are not mere questions upon a matter of science, in which case such evidence is admissible. But where the facts are admitted . or not disputed, and the question becomes substantially one of science only, it may be convenient to allow the question to be put in that general form, though the same cannot...
Page 337 - A' made a finer end and went away an it had been any christom child; a' parted even just between twelve and one, even at the turning o' the tide: for after I saw him fumble with the sheets, and play with flowers, and smile upon his fingers...
Page 307 - The question to be determined is, whether, at the time the act in question was committed, the prisoner had or had not the use of his understanding, so as to know that he was doing a wrong or wicked act.
Page 310 - What is the law respecting alleged crimes, committed by persons afflicted with insane delusion in respect of one or more particular subjects or persons ; as for instance, where, at the time of the commission of the alleged crime, the accused knew he was acting contrary to law, but did the act complained of with a view, under the influence of insane delusion, of redressing or avenging some supposed grievance or injury, or of producing some supposed public benefit.