Reasons and PersonsThis book challenges, with several powerful arguments, some of our deepest beliefs about rationality, morality, and personal identity. The author claims that we have a false view of our own nature; that it is often rational to act against our own best interests; that most of us have moral views that are directly self-defeating; and that, when we consider future generations the conclusions will often be disturbing. He concludes that moral non-religious moral philosophy is a young subject, with a promising but unpredictable future. |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accept achieve acting wrongly answer appeal apply argued argument assume benefit best fulfil bias brain and body cause cease child choice Common-Sense Morality concern conflict Consequentialist Consider continued existence deny described Desire-Fulfilment desires diflerent Dilemmas discuss disposition find first further fact give happens happiness imagined implies involve irrational justified kind later less matters Mere Addition Paradox moral reason moral theory Nagel never self-denying Non-Reductionist View objection one’s outcome better outcome worse outweighed pain past personal identity plausible possible Present-aim Theory Prisoner's Dilemmas psychological connectedness psychological continuity pure do-gooders question reasons for acting Reductionist View reject relation Replica Repugnant Conclusion resulting person revised S-Theorist self-defeating Self-interest Theory separately existing entities series-person Sidgwick significance Social Discount Rate someone stream of consciousness suffering Suppose Teletransportation temporally neutral theories about self-interest Theorist threat-ignorer transitive relation true Utilitarians worth living wrong