Simon and Schuster, May 11, 2010 - Social Science - 416 pages
A classic book about the phenomenon of suicide and its social causes written by one of the world’s most influential sociologists.
Emile Durkheim’s Suicide addresses the phenomenon of suicide and its social causes. Written by one of the world’s most influential sociologists, this classic argues that suicide primarily results from a lack of integration of the individual into society. Suicide provides readers with an understanding of the impetus for suicide and its psychological impact on the victim, family, and society.
What people are saying - Write a review
Individual Forms of the Different Types of Suicide
The Social Element of Suicide
Detailed Table of Contents
Other editions - View all
according altruistic suicide anomy appears Austria average become Catholic Celts cent characteristics cide coefficient of aggravation coefficient of preservation collective commit suicide common conscience considered constitution contrary countries crimes definite Denmark depend divorce Durkheim effect egoistic suicide environment existence explain fact feel figures France greater heredity homicide husbands hypothesis ideas imitation immunity increase individual influence insanity intensity inversely Italy kill latter less marriage married persons mental merely million inhabitants monomania moral moral constitution Morselli murders nature neurasthenia non-commissioned officers number of suicides observed occur Oettingen organic Paris period phenomenon population proportion Protestant Protestantism provinces Prussia race reason relation religion religious result Saxony Seine-et-Marne sentiments social causes social environment social suicide-rate society sort statistics suicidal tendency suicides per million Table tendency to suicide tion types of suicide unmarried Upper Palatinate varies vidual voluntary deaths wholly widowed widowhood wives women
Page 45 - We may then say conclusively: the term suicide is applied to all cases of death resulting directly or indirectly from a positive or negative act of the victim himself, which he knows will produce this result.
Page 42 - So, if we follow common use, we risk distinguishing what should be combined, or combining what should be distinguished, thus mistaking the real affinities of things, and accordingly misapprehending their nature. Only comparison affords explanation. A scientific investigation can thus be achieved only if it deals with comparable facts, and it is the more likely to succeed the more certainly it has combined all those that can be usefully compared.
Page 38 - I ties external to the individual. There is no principle for which we have received more criticism; but none is more fundamental. Indubitably for sociology to be possible, it must above all have an object all its own. It must take cognizance of a reality which is not in the domain of other sciences.