Changing Social Science: Critical Theory and Other Critical Perspectives
Daniel R. Sabia, Jerald Wallulis
SUNY Press - Social Science - 220 pages
Changing Social Science is both a description of and prescription for the current unease in the social sciences. It brings together articles by philosophers, sociologists, and political scientists who advocate changing the way social science is conceived and practiced. Focusing on the thought of past and present critics and proponents of critical inquiry—especially on the critical theory of Jürgen Habermas and on the disciplines of political science and sociology—collaborators on this volume support a critical form of social and political inquiry, outline its main characteristics, and examine its foundations, options, and unresolved problems.
The book is divided into section on reflexivity, methodology and explanation, and criticism and advocacy. From an introductory overview of the collection of articles and an account of the central issues in critical inquiry, discussions ensue on the methodological inadequacies and political implications of naturalist approaches to social and political inquiry; the nature and foundations of interpretive approaches to social science; the role, nature, and limits of causal explanations and causal theories of human action; the role of values in research and theory; and defenses and criticisms of the normative aspirations of both Habermas's critical theory and of critical social science in general.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The Ontological Presuppositions and Political Consequences
Method and Explanation
General Laws and Explaining Human Behavior
The Critical Project of Jiirgen Habermas
Other editions - View all
actors Arendt argues argument basis behavior beliefs causal causal explanation commonsense communicative action communicative competence conception of politics conﬂicts consensus constitute covering-law model critical social science critical theory critique deﬁned deﬁnition depends discourse dominant empirical essay ethical everyday example explanatory fact ﬁnd ﬁrst Frankfurt School generalizable interests Giddens Habermas’s hermeneutic historical hypothesis Ibid ideal speech situation individual inﬂuence inquiry institutions interaction interpretation Jiirgen Habermas John O’Neill justiﬁcation Karl-Otto Apel language laws Legitimation Crisis linguistic logical Marx Marxist means methodological methodological individualism modern moral natural sciences naturalist needs norms object one’s particular Philosophy political science positivist possible postulate of adequacy practical predict principles public sphere question rational reason reﬂect reﬂexive relations relevant role Schutz scientiﬁc self-understandings signiﬁcance social scientists social theory society sociology speciﬁc speech acts structure sufﬁcient theoretical thesis tradition trans Universal Pragmatics University validity claims value judgments Weber York