Education Myths: What Special Interest Groups Want You to Believe about Our Schools--and Why It Isn't So
How can we fix America's floundering public schools? Conventional wisdom says that schools and teachers need a lot more money, that poor and immigrant children can't do as well as most American kids, that high-stakes tests just produce teaching to the test, and that vouchers do little to help students while undermining our democracy. But what if the conventional wisdom is wrong? Jay Greene provocatively shows that much of what people believe about education policy is little more than a series of myths advanced by the special interest groups dominating public education.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
academic accountability testing Amrein attend autism average benefits Berliner better Bruce Biddle Caroline Hoxby charter schools claim class size reduction classroom college ready compared cost David Berliner dents Department of Education Digest of Education diploma disabled students dropouts education policy education spending Education Statistics 2002 effects Eric Hanushek evidence exit exams Florida funding grade graduation rates Greg Forster groups Hanushek high school graduates high-stakes tests Hispanic incentives increase integration Jay Greene learning Manhattan Institute math measure method Milwaukee Milwaukee public schools minority students Money Myth NAEP NCLB number of students parents participation percent percentile points private schools problems produce racial integration racial segregation reform salaries school choice school districts school system School Vouchers segregation smaller classes special education enrollment special education students student achievement student performance Teacher Pay teaching test scores U.S. Department University voucher competition voucher program