The Oxford Handbook of Organization Theory
Haridimos Tsoukas, Christian Knudsen
Oxford University Press, 2005 - Business & Economics - 644 pages
This book provides a forum for leading scholars in organization theory to engage in meta-theoretical reflection on the historical development, present state, and future prospects of organization theory as a scientific discipline. The central question explored is the epistemological status oforganization theory as a policy science. This is a meta-theoretical question; the object of analysis and debate in this volume is not a set of organizational phenomena, but organization theory itself. By drawing attention to organization theory as a practical social activity, this handbook reviews and evaluates important epistemological developments in the discipline. More specifically, the focus is on issues related to the nature of knowledge claims put forward in organization theory and thecontroversies surrounding the generation, validation, and utilization of such knowledge.Five sets of questions are raised in the handbook, each one of which is dealt with in a separate section: 1) What does a science of organizations consist of? What counts as valid knowledge in organization theory and why? How do different paradigms view organization theory as a science? 2) How has organization theory developed over time, and what structure has the field taken? What assumptions does knowledge produced in organization theory incorporate, and what forms do its knowledge claims take as they are put forward for public adoption? 3) How have certain well-known controversies in organization theory, such as for example, the structure/agency dilemma, the study of organizational culture, the different modes of explanation, the micro/macro controversy, and the differnet explanations produced by organizational economists andsociologists, been dealt with? 4) How, and in what ways, is knowledge generated in organization theory related to action? What features must organization theory knowledge have in order to be actionable, and of relevance to the world 'out there'? How have ethical concerns been taken into account in organization theory?5) What is the future of organization theory? What direction should the field take? What must change in the way research is conducted and key theoretical terms are conceptualized so that organization theory enhances its capacity to generate valid and relevant knowledge?
What people are saying - Write a review
Other editions - View all
Academy of Management action actors adaptation adhocracy Administrative Science Quarterly agency American analysis approach argued assumptions behavior bureaucracy Burrell Cambridge capitalism causal chapter Clegg concept construct context contingency theory Critical Management Studies Critical Theory critique discourse Donaldson economic emergence empirical environment epistemology ethics example feminist field firm function gender Habermas human individual industrial institutional interaction interests interpretive Journal of Management knowledge logic London Maanen Management Review managerial meaning modern normative objective ontological optimization Organization Science Organization Studies organization theory Organizational Culture organizational ecology Oxford paradigms perspective Pfeffer phenomena philosophy political population ecology positivism positivist postmodern practice problem produce Rational Choice Theory rationality reality relations relationship research programs resource dependence theory rhetoric role Sage scientific sensemaking Smircich social sciences society Sociology Strategic Management strategy structure style theoretical theorists tions transaction costs Tsoukas understanding University Press Weber Weick York