Thinking Like a Lawyer: An Introduction to Legal Reasoning
Students of the law are often told that they must learn to “think like a lawyer,” but they are given surprisingly little help in understanding just what this amounts to. Generally, they are expected to pick up this ability by example and perhaps by osmosis. But it remains the case that very few lawyers—even very good ones—are consciously aware of what it means to think like a lawyer.In this insightful and highly revealing book, Kenneth J. Vandevelde identifies, explains, and interprets the goals and methods of the well-trained lawyer. This is not a book about the content of the law; it is about a well-developed and valuable way of thinking that can be applied to many fields.Both practical and sophisticated, Thinking Like a Lawyer avoids the pitfalls common to most books on legal reasoning: It neither assumes too much legal knowledge nor condescends to its readers. Invaluable for law students and practicing lawyers, the book will also effectively interpret legal thinking for lay readers seeking a better understanding of the often mysterious ways of the legal profession.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
adopted analogy appeals apply argue argument assume breach Chapter characterize choice of law claim client common law consistent Constitution contract law create decide decision deduction determine dictum discussed dispute doctrine duty to warn efficiency elements ends and means Enlightenment epistemology example exist facts factual predicate favor federal formalism formalist free speech hazards holding identify imposing liability inconsistent indeterminacy injury issue judge judicial jurisdiction jury landowner law and economics law rules lawyer legal consequence Legal Realism legal reasoning process legislature limited majoritarianism minimum contacts minor premise negligence objective test opposing policies party person policies underlying policy judgments policy of individualism political precedent prevail prior promise promisor protecting purposivism realists referred relationship between ends requires resolved result right or duty rule of law rules defining specific rule stare decisis statute statutory interpretation strict liability Supreme Court synthesizing theory of justice tion trial underlying policies utilitarian whereas
Page 216 - The basic guidelines for the trier of fact must be: (a) whether "the average person, applying contemporary community standards...
Page 121 - Jr., who over a century ago wrote that the life of the law has not been logic; it has been experience. The felt necessities of the time, the prevalent moral and political theories, intuitions of public policy, avowed or unconscious, even the prejudices which judges share with their fellow-men have had a good deal more to do than syllogism in determining the rules by which men should be governed.
Page 114 - This growth is to be traced in the main through a series of cases; and much the shortest and best, if not the only way of mastering the doctrine effectually is by studying the cases in which it is embodied.
Page 114 - School, it was indispensable to establish at least two things : first, that law is a science ; secondly, that all the available materials of that science are contained in printed books.
Page 120 - This case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain. If it were a question whether I agreed with that theory, I should desire to study it further and long before making up my mind. But I do not conceive that to be my duty, because I strongly believe that my agreement or disagreement has nothing to do with the right of a majority to embody...
Page 35 - Hohfeld, Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning, 23 Yale LJ 16 (1913).
Page 114 - Moreover, the number of fundamental legal doctrines is much less than is commonly supposed; the many different guises in which the same doctrine is constantly making its appearance, and the great extent to which legal treatises are a repetition of each other, being the cause of much misapprehension. If these doctrines could be so classified and arranged that each should be found in its proper place, and nowhere else, they would cease to be formidable from their number.
Page 25 - The general rule is perfectly well settled that, where a statute is of doubtful meaning and susceptible upon its face of two constructions, the court may look into prior and contemporaneous acts, the reasons which induced the act in question, the mischiefs intended to be remedied, the extraneous circumstances, and the purpose intended to be accomplished by it to determine its proper construction.
Page 114 - Law, considered as a science, consists of certain principles or doctrines. To have such a mastery of these as to be able to apply them with constant facility and certainty to the ever-tangled skein of human affairs, is what constitutes a true lawyer; and hence to acquire that mastery should be the business of every earnest student of law.
Page 218 - We refer to the most specific level at which a relevant tradition protecting, or denying protection to, the asserted right can be identified.