Thinking about Opponent Behavior in Crisis and Conflict: A Generic Model for Analysis and Group Discussion
This Note draws on strategic analysis, cognitive psychology, gaming, and artificial intelligence modeling to describe a theory and concrete methodology for thinking about the likely and possible reasoning of opponents before or during crisis and conflict. The methodology is intended for use in analysis and defense planning, especially planning for possible limited contingencies. A fundamental tenet of the approach is that at least two semiformal models of the opponent should be developed and carried along through analysis and decisionmaking. The multiple-model approach is related to but goes beyond the familiar but often ineffective method of creating a devil's advocate. It would also be implemented as a structural change in analytic and group-discussion procedure. A key assumption of the approach, based on behavioral science's prospect theory, is that possible opponents are likely to become increasingly and unreasonably risk-accepting as they become emotionally more dissatisfied with their current situation and trends. The approach also frames decision issues in a natural way.
5 pages matching utility function in this book
Results 1-3 of 5
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
alternative Analysis and Group analytic anchor point approach Arab mind Assessment of Options assume assumptions Bad Marginal bad outcome believe best-case Best-estimate cognitive maps cognitive psychology concept consider context contingency planning crisis and conflict current situation Daniel Kahneman Davis and Arquilla decision tables defense planning described deterrence developing economic rationality example factors framing game theory group discussion groupthink Hierarchy of Variables Influence Diagram Iran Iraq John Arquilla Joint Staff Judgment Table Kahan Kahneman key variables leaders Lee Ross limited contingencies limited rationality literature logic Marginal High Marginal Moderate maximizes expected maximizing the likelihood methodology military Model of Decisionmaking Moderate Bad multiple models opponent models opponent's Opportunities political possible opponents predict probability prospect theory Prospects psychological qualitative rational-analytic reasoning regional specialists related discussion risk acceptance risk averse Risks are Low Saddam Hussein Slovic standard decision analysis status strategy strawman superpower thinking Tversky underestimating utility function values worst-case