Emperors and Bishops in Late Roman Invective

Front Cover
Cambridge University Press, May 2, 2013 - History - 294 pages
This innovative study illuminates the role of polemical literature in the political life of the Roman empire by examining the earliest surviving invectives directed against a living emperor. Written by three bishops (Athanasius of Alexandria, Hilary of Poitiers, Lucifer of Cagliari), these texts attacked Constantius II (337-61) for his vicious and tyrannical behaviour, as well as his heretical religious beliefs. This book explores the strategies employed by these authors to present themselves as fearless champions of liberty and guardians of faith, as they sought to bolster their authority at a time when they were out of step with the prevailing imperial view of Christian orthodoxy. Furthermore, by analysing this unique collection of writings alongside late antique panegyrics and ceremonial, it also rehabilitates anti-imperial polemic as a serious political activity and explores the ways in which it functioned within the complex web of presentations and perceptions that underpinned late Roman power relationships.
 

Contents

The use of abuse
1
Praise and blame in the Roman world
33
Constructing a Christian tyrant
78
Writing autohagiography
127
Living up to the past
178
Epilogue
220
Altercatio Heracliani cum Germinio
230
Epistula Liberii papae ad Eusebium
238
Hilary of Poitiers Contra Auxentium
252
Bibliography
261
Index
284
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2013)

Richard Flower is Lecturer in the Department of Classics and Ancient History, University of Exeter.

Bibliographic information