A Mathematical Theory of Evidence

Front Cover
Princeton University Press, Apr 21, 1976 - Business & Economics - 297 pages

Both in science and in practical affairs we reason by combining facts only inconclusively supported by evidence. Building on an abstract understanding of this process of combination, this book constructs a new theory of epistemic probability. The theory draws on the work of A. P. Dempster but diverges from Depster's viewpoint by identifying his "lower probabilities" as epistemic probabilities and taking his rule for combining "upper and lower probabilities" as fundamental.


The book opens with a critique of the well-known Bayesian theory of epistemic probability. It then proceeds to develop an alternative to the additive set functions and the rule of conditioning of the Bayesian theory: set functions that need only be what Choquet called "monotone of order of infinity." and Dempster's rule for combining such set functions. This rule, together with the idea of "weights of evidence," leads to both an extensive new theory and a better understanding of the Bayesian theory. The book concludes with a brief treatment of statistical inference and a discussion of the limitations of epistemic probability. Appendices contain mathematical proofs, which are relatively elementary and seldom depend on mathematics more advanced that the binomial theorem.

 

Contents

INTRODUCTION
3
1 Synopsis
4
2 The Idea of Chance
9
3 The Doctrine of Chances
12
4 Chances as Degrees of Belief
16
5 The Bayesian Theory of Partial Belief
18
6 The Role of Judgment
20
7 The Representation of Ignorance
22
5 Consistent Belief Functions
125
6 Independent Frames
127
7 Mathematical Appendix
129
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
141
1 The Class of Support Functions
142
2 Support Dubiety and Plausibility
144
3 The Vacuous Extension of a Support Function
146
4 Evidential Independence
147

8 Combination vs Conditioning
25
9 The Representation of Probable Reasoning
28
10 Statistical Inference
29
11 The Bayesian Theory as a Limiting Case
32
12 Probability
33
DEGREES OF BELIEF
35
2 Basic Probability Numbers
37
3 Belief Functions
39
4 Commonality Numbers
40
5 Degrees of Doubt and Upper Probabilities
42
6 Bayesian Belief Functions
44
7 Mathematical Appendix
46
DEMPSTERS RULE OF COMBINATION
57
1 Combining Two Belief Functions
58
2 Multiplying Commonality Numbers
61
3 Combining Several Belief Functions
62
4 The Weight of Conflict
64
5 Conditioning Belief Functions
66
6 Other Properties of Dempsters Rule
67
7 Mathematical Appendix
68
SIMPLE AND SEPARABLE SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
74
1 Simple Support Functions
75
3 The Weight of Evidence
77
4 Heterogeneous Evidence
79
5 Conflicting Evidence
82
6 Separable Support Functions
86
THE WEIGHTS OF EVIDENCE
88
1 Decomposing Separable Support Functions
89
2 Combining Weights of Evidence
90
3 The Assessment of Evidence
93
4 The Weight of Internal Conflict
95
5 The Impingement Function
97
6 The WeightofConflict Conjecture
98
7 Some Numerical Examples
100
8 Mathematical Appendix
103
COMPATIELE FRAMES OF DISCERNMENT 1 Refinements and Coarsenings
115
2 The Inner and Outer Reductions
117
3 Is There an U1timate Refinement?
119
4 Families of Compatible Frames
121
5 Cognitive Independence
149
6 Mathematical Appendix
152
THE DISCERNMENT OF EVIDENCE
172
1 Families of Compatible Support Functions
173
2 Discerning the Interaction of Evidence
175
3 Discerning Weights of Evidence
182
4 If the WeightofConflict Conjecture is True
185
5 Mathematical Appendix
186
CHAPTER 9 QUASI SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
196
1 Infinite Contradictory Evidence
197
2 The Class of Quasi Support Functions
199
3 Chances are not Degrees of Support
201
4 The Bayesian Profusion of Infinite Weights
202
5 Bayes Theorem
204
6 Mathematical Appendix
209
CONSONANCE
219
2 The Contour Function
222
3 The Embarrassment of Dissonance
223
4 Inferential Evidence
226
5 Mathematical Appendix
229
STATISTICAL EVIDENCE
237
1 A Convention for Assessing Statistical Evidence
238
2 The Weights of Evidence
245
3 Epistemic vs Aleatory Combination
247
4 The Effect of a Bayesian Prior
250
5 Discounting Statistical Evidence
251
6 Specifications on Compatible Frames
255
7 The Role of Supposition
258
8 Perspective
262
9 Mathematical Appendix
264
THE DUAL NATURE OF PROBABLE REASONING
274
2 The Need for Assumptions
276
3 Choosing our Frames of Discernment
279
4 The Role of Epistemic Probability
284
5 Two Tasks
285
BIBLIOGRAPHY
287
INDEX
292
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (1976)

Glenn Shafer is professor at Rutgers University and director of the Ph.D. program.

Bibliographic information