The Object Stares Back: On the Nature of Seeing
At first it appears that nothing could be easier than seeing. We just focus our eyes and take in whatever is before us. This ability seems detached, efficient and rational - as if the eyes were competent machines telling us everything about the world without distorting it in any way. But those ideas are just illusions, James Elkins argues, and he suggests that seeing is undependable, inconsistent and cauthg up in the threads of the unconscious. Blindness is not the opposite of vision, but its constant companion, and even the foundation of seeing itself. Using drawings, paintings, diagrams and photographs to illustrate his points, Elkins raises intriguing questions and offers astonishing perceptions about the nature of vision.
What people are saying - Write a review
THE OBJECT STARES BACK: On the Nature of SeeingUser Review - Jane Doe - Kirkus
Unfocused but frequently illuminating meditations on how we see and how we don't. What the deconstructionists did for language, exposing its grave limitations and fallibilities, Elkins attempts to do ... Read full review
LibraryThing ReviewUser Review - mosaic42 - LibraryThing
From the Introduction: "Ultimately, seeing alters the thing that is seen and transforms the seer. Seeing is metamorphosis, not mechanism." This is an axiom of how I see and think. (john) Read full review
One Just Looking
Two The Object Stares Back
Three LOOKING AWAY AND SEEING
Four Seeing Bodies
Five What Is a Face?