Robustness of Queueing Models |
Common terms and phrases
according activity amplitude Appendix arrival process assume assumption average BEGIN BUSY calculate called chosen Compute constant cost curve cost ratio CTIME Cw/Cs described desired distributed divided elements estimate expected experimental conditions F-Test FALSE follows FORMAT function given graph higher homogeneous Poisson process hour increased independent interarrival interval mean arrival rate mean waiting measure method number of servers number of units observations obtain occur optimum decision OPTIMUM SERVERS optimum solution PRINT probability distribution Probability of type procedure Program proportion QLENGTH question queueing model queueing system random numbers REAL represents robustness sample segments Selection SERTIME shift period shown in fig shows significant at 0.10 simulation starting values Statistical TABLE TIDT TRUE TVC/Cs type I error unit values variance variation violation waiting WRITE WRITE(PUNCH