An Investigation of the Relative Effectiveness of Two Study Techniques in History |
Contents
The Selection of Material the Development | 14 |
The Physical Equipment and the Subjects | 23 |
Time Required to Read the Material The Story | 45 |
13 other sections not shown
Common terms and phrases
92 pupils acted as subjects average gains Boys Girls carefully and rapidly cent Chicago Cincinnati different study techniques DISTRIBUTION OF PUPILS experiment exportation favor of Method Final Test gain with Method given in Table grade H high habit check list high school immediate learning index of statistical intelligence Intelligence quotients Junior Sophomore Freshman manufacture material learned method of study Method X Method notes when studying number of pupils ordinarily took notes Outline the material pupils read pupils study pupils who gained PUPILS WHO RETAINED questions rags rate of reading re-read the material read and re-read read per minute read the material relative effectiveness reliability coefficient required to take results obtained retention tests Senior Junior Sophomore Sophomore Freshman Total statistical significance study habit check study material study period study tech TABULATION take notes take the pre-tests University of Wisconsin Verona High School wood pulp words per minute X Method Y