Federal Magistrates Act: Hearings, Ninetieth Congress, Second Session ... March 7 and 13, 1968, Volume 4
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1968 - United States magistrates - 161 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
additional administration amended appeal appointed appropriate approval areas arrested assigned Association attorney authority believe bill Chairman chapter civil committed committee compensation Conference Congress consideration considered constitutional criminal defendant Department determine Director district court district judges duties effective establish examination existing Federal Magistrates Federal Magistrates Act FINLEY full-time magistrates functions further give going hearings held House individual initial judicial Judicial Conference Judiciary jurisdiction jury justice lawyers legislation locations matter mean minor offenses part-time magistrates performance person petty offenses possible practice preliminary present problem procedure proceedings proposed provisions question reason recommendations record reference relating Rogers RogFRs rules salary Senator TYDINGs serve specific subcommittee subsection suggest term Thank thereof tion title 28 trial tried U.S. commissioner U.S. magistrate United States Code United States commissioners United States magistrates WHITENER
Page 27 - SEC. 303. (a) Any person who violates any of the provisions of section 301 shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall on conviction thereof be subject to imprisonment for not more than one year, or a fine of not more than $1,000, or both...
Page 27 - States magistrate shall have jurisdiction to try persons accused of, and sentence persons convicted of, minor offenses committed within that judicial district.
Page 75 - I was Chairman of the Section of Judicial Administration of the American Bar Association...
Page 48 - The informations, in charging violations of § 301 (a), did not allege that the acts committed were done "with intent to defraud." Hence the maximum penalty was imprisonment for not more than a year, or a fine of not more than $1,000, or both. Prosecution by information was therefore authorized by the statute (see Duke v.
Page 123 - States district courts; (2) assistance to a district judge in the conduct of pretrial or discovery proceedings in civil or criminal actions; and (3) preliminary review of applications for posttrial relief made by individuals convicted of criminal offenses, and submission of a report and recommendations to...
Page 40 - If from the evidence it appears to the commissioner that there is probable cause to believe that an offense has been committed...
Page 98 - ... (3) In the case of an individual appointed to serve in a national park, he resides within the exterior boundaries of that park, or at some place reasonably adjacent thereto; (4) He is not related by blood or marriage to a judge of the appointing court or courts at the time of his initial appointment.
Page 53 - A state has the right to impose conditions, not in conflict with the constitution or the laws of the United States, to the transaction of business within its territory by an insurance company chartered by another state, or to exclude such company from its territory, or, having given a license, to revoke it, with or without cause.