The Dreyfus Trials
Legal systems like to think of themselves as impartial and fair, dispensing the objective morality of Justice. But, from time to time, a court of law can be as political, prejudiced, and biased as any other arm of the State. The classic instance is the story of the trials of Alfred Dreyfus. In December 1894 a French military tribunal found Alfred Dreyfus guilty of high treason. Dreyfus was a Jew; the War Office was determined that at all costs the honour and good name of the Army must be upheld; and both left and right in the French Parliament used the convulsions of the case for what they believed to be their own advantage. The original verdict affected the Army, the Church, the Judiciary and the State over the following twelve years. Even now the case provokes arguments of fierce intensity. Guy Chapman's classic exposition of the long drawn-out trials has been out of print for many years and this present thorough revision incorporates the findings of recent scholarship; it is compellingly readable and unapproachably authoritative. The questions still remain - how far were the Dreyfus Trials the product of a conscious conspiracy, how far an unconscious conspiracy of silence, and how far did 'justice' prevail?
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The Bordereau I
The Verdict and Sentence
13 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
accepted accused allowed Appeal Appeal Court Army asked August believed Billot Boisdeffre bordereau Brisson brought Cabinet called Cavaignac Chamber charge chief court court-martial Criminal defence documents doubt Dreyfus Dreyfus's du Paty Dupuy Esterhazy Esterhazy's evidence examination fact Foreign France French friends further gave German given Gonse Government guilty hand head heard Henry innocent interest January judges justice knew known Labori later Leblois Léon Bourgeois letter majority March Mathieu matter Méline Mercier military Minister months Nationalists never November October Office once Paris passed Paty Pellieux Picquart political President prisoner question Radicals received refused Reinach remained Rennes replied Republican revision Right Sandherr Schwartzkoppen secret seen Senate sent showed shown staff taken told took trial vote War Office witnesses writing written wrote Zurlinden