 | Abraham Clark Freeman - Law reports, digests, etc - 1894 - 1022 pages
...principle of law is thus stated in Littleton v. Richardson, 34 NH 187; 66 Am. Dec. 759: "When a person ia responsible over to another, either by operation of...pendency of the suit, and requested to take upon him the defense of it, he is no longer regarded as a stranger, because he has the right to appear and defend... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - Courts - 1896 - 772 pages
...499, the language of the court in Littleton v. Richardson, 34 NH 179, 187, was quoted and adopted : " When a person is responsible over to another, either...defence of it, he is no longer regarded as a stranger, because he has the right to appear and defend the action, and has the same means and advantages of... | |
 | William John Tossell - Law reports, digests, etc - 1923 - 914 pages
...this character of cases is well stated in 24 American & Eng. Ency. Law (2 Ed.) p. 740, et seq : "Where a person is responsible over to another, either by operation of law or by express contract, for whatever may be justly recovered against such other, and he is duly notified of the pendency of... | |
 | Marcus Tullius Hun - Law reports, digests, etc - 1884 - 794 pages
...that judgment. In Heiser v. Hatch (86 N/. Y., 614, MSS. opinion), the rule is laid down as follows : " When a person is responsible over to another either by operation of law or express contract, and he is duly notified of the pendency of the suit, he is no longer regarded as... | |
 | Richard Ross Perry - Pleading - 1897 - 536 pages
...in modem practice, as real actions have been abolished ; but the rule seems to be established that when a person is responsible over to another, either by operation of law or by express contract, and notice has been given him of the pendency of the suit, and he has been requested to take upon himself... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1898 - 918 pages
...responsible over to another who is sued, either by operation of law or express contract, and such person is duly notified of the pendency of the suit and requested to take upon himself the defense of it. the judgment is conclusive against him whether he appears or not, is quite... | |
 | Wisconsin. Supreme Court, Abram Daniel Smith, Philip Loring Spooner, Obadiah Milton Conover, Frederic King Conover, Frederick William Arthur, Frederick C. Seibold - Law reports, digests, etc - 1899 - 772 pages
...responsible over to another who is sued, either by operation of law or express contract, and such person is duly notified of the pendency of the suit and requested to take upon himself the defense of it, the judgment is conclusive against him whether he appears or not, is quite... | |
 | Railroad law - 1899 - 932 pages
...responsible over to another who is sued, either by operation of law or express contract, and such person is duly notified of the pendency of the suit and requested to take upon himself the defense of it, the judgment is conclusive against him RCas Schaefer v. City of Fond du... | |
 | Washington (State). Supreme Court, Eugene Glenroy Kreider - Law reports, digests, etc - 1901 - 884 pages
...well stated in Littleton r. Richardson, 34 NH 179 (66 Am. Dec. 759) in the following language: "But when a person is responsible over to another, either...defence of it, he is no longer regarded as a stranger, because he has the right to appear and defend the action, and has the same means and advantages of... | |
| |
... the defense of it, he is no longer regarded as a stranger, because he has the right to appear and defend the action, and has the same means and advantages of controverting the claim as if he was the real and nominal party upon the record. 
