Evaluations of Police Suitability and Fitness for Duty
Forensic mental health assessment (FMHA) has grown into a specialization informed by research and professional guidelines. This series presents up-to-date information on the most important and frequently conducted forms of FMHA. The 20 topical volumes address best approaches to practice for particular types of evaluation in the criminal, civil and juvenile/family areas. Each volume contains a thorough discussion of the relevant legal and psychological concepts, followed by a step-by-step description of the assessment process from preparing for the evaluation to writing the report and testifying in court.
Volumes include the following helpful features:
- Boxes that zero in on important information for use in evaluations
- Tips for best practice and cautions against common pitfalls
- Highlighting of relevant case law and statutes
- Separate list of assessment tools for easy reference
- Helpful glossary of key terms for the particular topic
In making recommendations for best practice, authors consider empirical support, legal relevance, and consistency with ethical and professional standards. These volumes offer invaluable guidance for anyone involved in conducting or using forensic evaluations.
A majority of police departments across the country conduct psychological evaluations of their police applicants and many also conduct periodic evaluations of incumbent police officers. With a small percentage of psychologists conducting these evaluations, and an even smaller number who have passed through board certification in forensic psychology or police and public safety psychology, there is a pressing need for education and training resources for practitioners seeking to develop competency in this area of practice. Evaluations of Police Suitability and Fitness for Duty, fills a gap in the literature, and explains the legal, procedural, ethical, and clinical foundations for these types of evaluations untethered to any single assessment instrument. Throughout the text, authors David M. Corey and Mark Zelig distinguish between enforceable, standards-based requirements and aspirational best practices. The book starts with a review of the most prominent federal laws and regulations, professional practice guidelines, and ethical standards pertinent to these evaluations. From there, applied chapters provide detailed procedural guidance, including advice for obtaining informed consent, providing disclosure to the involved parties, conducting clinical and collateral interviews, selecting written assessment instruments, integrating assessment findings to reach determinations of suitability and fitness, and preparing written reports and testimony for various audiences and uses.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
ability agency American applicants appropriate asked assessment Association authors behavior Ben-Porath BEST PRACTICE bias California candidates chapter City clinical common competence conclusions condition conduct consider consideration constructs Corey correlated court decision demands described determine disability discussed document duty employee employment evidence examination example expert fact federal findings fitness evaluations forensic forms functioning guidelines hiring identify impairment important individual informed consent interpretation interview involving issue jurisdictions law enforcement limitations mandated measures mental health noted obtain offer opinion organizational party perform person police officer position practice practitioners preemployment present problems procedures professional protected psychological evaluations psychologist published questions reasonable recommend records referral regarding relevant request requirements response risk Rule scales scores screening selection sources specific standard studies suitability suitability evaluations tion validity written