Evaluation for Capital Sentencing
Forensic mental health assessment (FMHA) has grown into a specialization informed by research and professional guidelines. This series presents up-to-date information on the most important and frequently conducted forms of FMHA. The 19 topical volumes address best approaches to practice for particular types of evaluation in the criminal, civil, and juvenile/family areas. Each volume contains a thorough discussion of the relevant legal and psychological concepts, followed by a step-by-step description of the assessment process from preparing for the evaluation to writing the report and testifying in court. Volumes include the following helpful features: - Boxes that zero in on important information for use in evaluations - Tips for best practice and cautions against common pitfalls - Highlighting of relevant case law and statutes - Separate list of assessment tools for easy reference - Helpful gloassary of key terms for the particular topic In making recommendations for best practice, authors consider empirical support, legal relevance, and consistency with ethical and professional standards. These volumes offer invaluable guidance for anyone involved in conducting or using forensic evaluations. This book addresses the evaluation of criminals for capital sentencing, and looks at the history and importance of this process, the legal standards and the procedure for applying this evaluation in court. Established empirical foundations from the behavioral, social, and medical sciences are then presented. Finally, the book provides a detailed "how-to" for practitioners, including information on data collection, interpretation, report writing and expert testimony.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
abuse adverse developmental factors adverse factors aggravating factor American Psychiatric Association American Psychological Association and/or Antisocial Personality Disorder assaultive misconduct asserted assessment for prison attorney base rates behavior BEST PRACTICE capital offense capital sentencing evaluations chapter 4 chapter conduct context convicted murderers criminal responsibility Cunningham & Reidy Cunningham & Sorensen death penalty death row defendant defendant’s defense counsel defense-retained detailed family members findings forensic mental health Forensic Psychologists future violence guilt phase implications INFO informed consent inquiry interview involved jurisdictions mental health experts mental health professionals mental retardation mitigation investigator mitigation specialist Model Penal Code moral culpability neuropsychological personality testing potential predictive prison violence procedures prosecution psychological disorders rate of assault records relevant requirements Retrieved role sentencing phase serious violence SGFP specific State-retained expert statutory mitigating factors Texas third parties tion trial U.S. Supreme Court violence in prison violence risk assessment