The Senate Syndrome: The Evolution of Procedural Warfare in the Modern U.S. Senate
With its rock-bottom approval ratings, acrimonious partisan battles, and apparent inability to do its legislative business, the U.S. Senate might easily be deemed unworthy of attention, if not downright irrelevant. This book tells us that would be a mistake. Because the Senate has become the place where the policy-making process most frequently stalls, any effective resolution to our polarized politics demands a clear understanding of how the formerly august legislative body once worked and how it came to the present crisis. Steven S. Smith provides that understanding in The Senate Syndrome.
Like the Senate itself, Smith’s account is grounded in history. Countering a cacophony of inexpert opinion and a widespread misunderstanding of political and legislative history, the book fills in a world of missing information—about debates among senators concerning fundamental democratic processes and the workings of institutional rules, procedures, and norms. And Smith does so in a clear and engaging manner. He puts the present problems of the Senate—the “Senate syndrome,” as he calls them—into historical context by explaining how particular ideas and procedures were first framed and how they transformed with the times. Along the way he debunks a number of myths about the Senate, many perpetuated by senators themselves, and makes some pointed observations about the media’s coverage of Congress.
The Senate Syndrome goes beyond explaining such seeming technicalities as the difference between regular filibusters and post-cloture filibusters, the importance of chair rulings, the changing role of the parliamentarian, and the debate over whether appeals of points of order should be subject to cloture margins, to show why understanding them matters. At stake is resolution of the Senate syndrome, and the critical underlying struggle between majority rule and minority rights in American policy making.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
action adopted agreement allowed amendments andthe appeared appropriations appropriations bills argument avoid became become behavior bill block budget Byrd bythe chapter cloture colleagues committee conference Congress Congressional Record conservative consideration considered constitutional continued court created debate decades delay Democrats developments differences effect efforts elections expected Figure filibuster floor force forthe frequently gain holds House important included individual institution interests inthe invoke issues judicial nominations legislation liberals limit majority leader majority party Mansfield matter measures minority motion move nearly nominations nuclear objected observed obstruction obstructionism offer ofthe onthe opportunities opposed option parliamentary partisan passed period political positions postcloture practice precedent presiding presiding officer procedural proceed proposals provisions question recent reconciliation reform Reid Republicans request resolution response rules Senate Senate’s simple majority southern standing strategies syndrome tactics thatthe theSenate threshold tothe unanimous consent votes wanted XXII