JURIES AND JUDGES VERSUS THE LAW: Virginia's Provincial Legal Perspective, 1783-1828Early in 1582 his princely grace Duke Wilhelm the Younger of Braunschweig-Luneburg took to roaming the streets at night, shooting off pistols at imaginary enemies and shouting into the dark. His advisers ordered him confined, but in August of that year he attacked his devoted wife, Dorothea, with a pair of tailor's shears. What was to be done? Wilhelm was in good company. During the sixteenth century close to thirty German dukes, landgraves, margraves, and counts, plus one Holy Roman emperor, were known as mad - so mentally disordered that serious steps had to be taken to remove them from office or to obtain medical care for them. This book is the first to study these princes (along with a few princesses) as a group and in context. The result is a flood of new light on the history of Renaissance medicine and of psychiatry, on German politics in the century of the Reformation, and on the shifting Renaissance definitions of madness. With an acute ear for the nuances of sixteenth-century diagnosis, H. C. Erik Midelfort details the expansion of a learned medical vocabulary with which contemporaries could describe these demented monarchs, as we watch the rise to prominence of the "melancholy prince". He also documents the transition from the brutal deposition of mad princes during the late Middle Ages to the imposition of medical therapy by the middle of the sixteenth century, taking note of the competing claims of medicine and theology. Mad Princes of Renaissance Germany takes a new look at the issues raised in Michel Foucault's Madness and Civilization and provides an alternative framework of interpretation. A variety of professional and institutional discourses competed for dominance overRenaissance princes who were considered mad, and an amazingly broad spectrum of therapeutic options - from herbal baths to the application of dog entrails to the inducement of hemorrhoids - were open to relatives and courtiers seeking to stave off a constitutional crisis by curing the monarch of his madness. As historians of psychiatry will appreciate, Midelfort's attention to Renaissance diagnostic categories suggests how modern diagnoses inform the perception and experience of mental illness. Students of political theory will be intrigued by the implications of madness for the legitimacy of the state. And the general reader is invited to visit a lively gallery of Renaissance rulers, caught up in a variety of psychic and moral dilemmas that ultimately pushed them over the edge. |
Common terms and phrases
agrarian amendments American Anti-Federalists British creditors British debt Call circuit court common law commonwealth Congress county courthouse county courts Court at Prince court of appeals court system Crenshaw debate debtors defendant district court established Fairfax's Devisee Family Papers federal government federal judiciary Federalists Fleming Fredericksburg George Tucker Giles Gilmer ginia Hening and Munford Henry's Hunter Hunter's Lessee Hustings Court Hylton ibid interests internal improvements James Jay Treaty Jefferson John Marshall John Taylor judicial review Judiciary Act jurors justice land legislation legislature Leigh liberty litigation Madison Marshall Court Martin Munford national government Northern Neck Old Republicans opinion Pendleton plaintiffs political Prince Edward County principles provincial Randolph ratifying convention Resolutions of 1798 Richmond Roane's session Slate River Slate River Company Southside Spencer Roane Statutes Supreme Court tion treaty of 1783 Univ Virginia Resolutions vote VSLA William William Branch Giles Wirt Wythe