Justice Curtis in the Civil War Era: At the Crossroads of American Constitutionalism

Front Cover
University of Virginia Press, 2005 - History - 271 pages
0 Reviews
Reviews aren't verified, but Google checks for and removes fake content when it's identified

During a career as both a lawyer and a Supreme Court justice, Benjamin R. Curtis addressed practically every major constitutional question of the mid-nineteenth century, making judgments that still resonate in American law. Aside from a family memoir written by his brother over one hundred years ago, however, no book-length treatment of Curtis exists. Now Stuart Streichler has filled this gap in judicial biography, using Curtis's life and work as a window on the most serious constitutional crisis in American history, the Civil War.

Curtis was the lead attorney for President Andrew Johnson in the Senate's impeachment trial, where he delivered the pivotal argument, and his was an influential voice in the pervasive constitutional struggle between states and the federal government. He is best remembered, however, for dissenting in the Dred Scott case, in which he disputed Chief Justice Taney's proslavery ruling that no black person could ever become a citizen of the United States. In the wake of the decision, Curtis resigned from the court, the only justice in the Supreme Court's history to do so on grounds of principle. Yet he also clashed with Boston's abolitionists over enforcing the Fugitive Slave Act, and he opposed the Emancipation Proclamation.

In a period when the Constitution was radically transformed from a charter that protected slavery to one that granted all persons equal rights of citizenship, Justice Curtis maintained his faith in the Constitution as an adaptable instrument of self-government and tried to mark out a path for gradual change. Streichler assesses Curtis's common-law methods in the context of his divisive times and shows how the judge's views continue to shed light on issues that have become once again relevant, such as the presidential impeachment process and, after 9/11, the use of military tribunals to try civilians.

 

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Contents

In the Whig Tradition
9
The Fugitive Slave Controversy
38
FederalState Conflict in a Commercial Republic
66
The Promise of Due Process
98
The Dred Scott Case
119
The Presidents War Powers
151
The Johnson Impeachment Trial
172
Conclusion
199
Index
255
Copyright

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2005)

Stuart Streichler is an Affiliate Associate Professor in the Law, Societies and Justice Program at the University of Washington in Seattle.

Bibliographic information