Occupational Prestige in Comparative PerspectiveChapter 3. Intrasocietal Consensus in Occupational Prestige Evaluations; SUBGROUP VARIATIONS IN PRESTIGE RATINGS; HOW REPRESENTATIVE ARE STUDENTS IN THEIR OCCUPATIONAL EVALUATIONS; URBAN-RURAL AND REGIONAL VARIATIONS; VARIATION OVER TIME; SUMMARY; Chapter 4. The Extent of Intersocietal Similarity in Occupational Prestige Hierarchies; EXTENT OF PRESTIGE SIMILARITY; REGIONAL AND CULTURAL VARIATIONS; RATINGS OF NONMANUAL AND MANUAL OCCUPATIONS; SUMMARY; PART III: ISSUES OF SUBSTANCE; Chapter 5. Explaining the Worldwide Similarity in Prestige Hierarchies. |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
agricultural analysis ANIMAL HUSBANDRY Appendix assigned average correlation blue-collar Chapter CLERICAL AND RELATED coding comparisons computed Costa Rica cultural data sets differences DRIVER Duncan ENGINEER Farm farmers FORESTRY WORKERS FRENCH GUIANA Ghana GUYANA Hence highly included income incumbents India individual intercountry International Labour Office intersocietal ISCO scheme labor force major group Makers MANAGER manual Mauritania Mean rating minor Nepal Nigeria nonmanual number of occupations occu occupational evaluations occupational groups occupational prestige hierarchies occupational roles occupational status occupational structure occupational titles Occupations rated pairs of countries particular occupations power and privilege prestige evaluations prestige of occupations prestige ratings prestige scores prestige similarity prestige studies procedure PRODUCTION AND RELATED PROFESSIONAL rated on 5-point raters RELATED WORKERS SALES WORKERS sample scale according SERVICE WORKERS skill South-West Africa specific occupations standard deviation Standard Scale scores SURINAM Table Taiwan Technicians tional tions Treiman Uganda utilized variations Yugoslavia Zambia