Experts and Politicians: Reform Challenges to Machine Politics in New York, Cleveland, and ChicagoDuring the Progressive Era, reform candidates in New York, Cleveland, and Chicago challenged the status quo--with strikingly different results: brief triumph in New York, sustained success in Cleveland, and utter failure in Chicago. Kenneth Finegold seeks to explain this phenomenon by analyzing the support for reform in these cities, especially the role of an emerging class of urban policy professionals in each campaign. His work offers a new way of looking at urban reform opposition to machine politics. |
Contents
Machine Politics and Reform Politics | 3 |
Incorporating Experts | 15 |
NEW YORK FROM TRADITIONAL REFORM TO PROGRESSIVISM | 33 |
Seth Low and Traditional Reform | 35 |
Hearst McClellan and Gaynor Municipal Populism and the Tammany Response | 45 |
John Purroy Mitchel and the Politics of Municipal Research | 54 |
CLEVELAND FROM MUNICIPAL POPULISM TO PROGRESSIVISM | 69 |
McKissonism and the Muny | 73 |
Carter Harrison versus Reform | 123 |
Edward Dunne Municipal Populism and Party Factionalism | 138 |
Busse Merriam and the Bureau of Public Efficiency | 151 |
CONCLUSIONS | 169 |
Progressivism Electoral Change and Public Policy | 171 |
Appendix | 185 |
Notes | 189 |
Bibliography | 229 |


