Comparative Studies in History of Religions: Their Aim, Scope, and Validity

Front Cover
Erik Reenberg Sand, Jørgen Podemann Sørensen
Museum Tusculanum Press, 1999 - Religion - 155 pages
It was Max Müller who coined the famous motto of the comparative study of religion "He who knows one, knows none." Since its first beginning in the second half of the nineteenth century, the history of religions has always somehow invoked comparative insights as its very raison d'être. The nature of these insights has been under constant debate and at times, scepticism and devastating critique of the more pretentious comparative projects made regionally specialized studies seem the only legitimate enterprise within the discipline. The fact remains, however, that the major general issues addressed by historians of religions are rooted in considerations of a comparative nature. The dossier of papers from an international conference held at the University of Copenhagen discusses tradition as well as new approaches to the fundamental issues of the aim, scope and validity of comparative studies in history of religions. No longer bound to monolithic visions of history and human nature, these papers critically explore the limits and the roles of comparison in the study of religion.
 

Contents

Introduction
7
Bruce Lincoln
41
BrittMari Näsström
57
Tord Olsson
75
William E Paden
93
Erik Reenberg Sand
109
Jens Peter Schjødt
121
Jørgen Podemann Sørensen
131
Williams
143
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Bibliographic information