Managing the Research UniversityIn recent years, the federal government and private industry have entrusted universities to manage a considerable portion of their research portfolio. Many, but certainly not all, university research administrators come from the faculty ranks, and many have little or no formal training in this role. More often than not, they learn the profession "on the job." Some facets of research administration simply require either "common sense" or personal experience as a research-active faculty member. However, there are many other aspects that benefit from formal training. These include the historical and legal background behind many institutional and federal policies and regulations. Managing the Research University aims to fill that void by providing a comprehensive background and discussion of the issues and challenges of managing a university's research enterprise. It provides a thorough background to research administration, covering all of the main issues confronting academic research administrators. |
Contents
CHAPTER 1 The Chief Research Officer | 3 |
CHAPTER 2 External Relations | 21 |
CHAPTER 3 Strategic Planning | 37 |
CHAPTER 4 Resources | 47 |
CHAPTER 5 Enhancing Research Resources | 69 |
CHAPTER 6 Resource Investments | 90 |
CHAPTER 7 Centers and Institutes | 113 |
CHAPTER 8 SponsoredResearch Services | 128 |
CHAPTER 11 Restricted Research | 184 |
CHAPTER 12 Human Subjects | 197 |
CHAPTER 13 Animal Use and Care | 221 |
CHAPTER 14 Intellectual Property | 239 |
CHAPTER 15 Technology Transfer | 259 |
CHAPTER 16 Economic Development | 278 |
CHAPTER 17 Assessment and Evaluation | 297 |
312 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
academic accessed January According accreditation activities addition administration agency agreement allow amount animals application approval Association authority award become budget cells chief research officer classified committee compliance conduct conflicts of interest context contract costs course dean decision Department effort established evaluation example executive expected expenditures facilities faculty members federal filing funds goal grant guidelines Health human important individual institution intellectual property interest invention involved issues laboratory less license limit major material organization patent percent performance personnel potential practice prepare procedures proposals question reason receive regulations request requires responsible salary Science Smith sources specific sponsored staff subjects transfer Ultimately university’s usually