Is It Safe?: BPA and the Struggle to Define the Safety of ChemicalsWe are all just a little bit plastic. Traces of bisphenol A or BPA, a chemical used in plastics production, are widely detected in our bodies and environment. Is this chemical, and its presence in the human body, safe? What is meant by safety? Who defines it, and according to what information? Is It Safe? narrates how the meaning of the safety of industrial chemicals has been historically produced by breakthroughs in environmental health research, which in turn trigger contests among trade associations, lawyers, politicians, and citizen activists to set new regulatory standards. Drawing on archival research and extensive interviews, author Sarah Vogel explores the roots of the contemporary debate over the safety of BPA, and the concerns presented by its estrogen-like effects even at low doses. Ultimately, she contends that science alone cannot resolve the political and economic conflicts at play in the definition of safety. To strike a sustainable balance between the interests of commerce and public health requires recognition that powerful interests will always try to shape the criteria for defining safety, and that the agenda for environmental health research should be protected from capture by any single interest group. |
Other editions - View all
Is It Safe?: BPA and the Struggle to Define the Safety of Chemicals Sarah A. Vogel Limited preview - 2012 |
Is It Safe?: BPA and the Struggle to Define the Safety of Chemicals Sarah A. Vogel Limited preview - 2013 |
Common terms and phrases
administration adverse effects advocates agency's American animals argued baby bottles biological Bisphenol BPA's cancer carcinogenesis carcinogens cell Center CERHR chemical industry chemical's Chemicals in Food Committee compounds concern Congress consumer cost-benefit analysis cyclamate debate defined Delaney clause detectable developmental Diethylstilbestrol disease disruption dose-response dose-response relationship early EDSTAC endocrine disruptors endocrine-disrupting chemicals environment environmental estrogens epigenetic evaluate evidence FDA's federal fetal food additives Green Chemistry hazards health effects hormone Hueper human exposure Ibid industrial chemicals Institute interpretation issue junk science laboratory levels low doses low-dose effects McLachlan NIEHS organizations panel papers pesticides Plastics Industry political polycarbonate potential precautionary principle production prostate public health receptor reform regulation regulatory decision reproductive toxicity risk assessment Saal safe safety standard scientific sound science studies substances synthetic Theo Colborn tion Tozzi trade associations


