Appealing to Justice: Prisoner Grievances, Rights, and Carceral Logic
Having gained unique access to California prisoners and corrections officials and to thousands of prisoners’ written grievances and institutional responses, Kitty Calavita and Valerie Jenness take us inside one of the most significant, yet largely invisible, institutions in the United States. Drawing on sometimes startlingly candid interviews with prisoners and prison staff, as well as on official records, the authors walk us through the byzantine grievance process, which begins with prisoners filing claims and ends after four levels of review, with corrections officials usually denying requests for remedies. Appealing to Justice is both an unprecedented study of disputing in an extremely asymmetrical setting and a rare glimpse of daily life inside this most closed of institutions. Quoting extensively from their interviews with prisoners and officials, the authors give voice to those who are almost never heard from. These voices unsettle conventional wisdoms within the sociological literature—for example, about the reluctance of vulnerable and/or stigmatized populations to name injuries and file claims, and about the relentlessly adversarial subjectivities of prisoners and correctional officials—and they do so with striking poignancy. Ultimately, Appealing to Justice reveals a system fraught with impediments and dilemmas, which delivers neither justice, nor efficiency, nor constitutional conditions of confinement.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Naming Blaming and Claiming in an Uncommon
This Is a Prison
Administrative Consistency Downstream
Grievance Narratives as Frames of Meaning Profiles
Prisoner and Staff Primary Frame Consistency
Other editions - View all
administrative African American ance appeals coordinators appeals process asked bureaucratic California prisons Captain carceral logic CDCR officials CDCR responses CDCR staff CDCR’s cell chapter civil rights claims conflicting narratives context correctional court cultural custody level Darryl White David Miller decision denied disciplinary disputing emphasis examiner explained file grievances formal level griev grievance filing grievance process grievance system Henry Lopez Hispanic IAB official incarceration informal level Inmate Appeals Branch inmate grievances institutional interviews issues Josť Cruz legal consciousness legal mobilization legitimacy level of review Lucinda Gray Mark Tilden Monrose narratives Orlando Martinez partial grant percent PLRA prison officials prisoner appellants prisoner grievances prisoners who file problems procedures racial random sample reported request retaliation revealed rights consciousness rules Sandra James Sarat self-blame sometimes strip searches talk tell there’s they’re tion Title 15 told total institution U.S. Supreme Court violations written grievances