Seeking Good Debate: Religion, Science, and Conflict in American Public Life
Why do religion and science often appear in conflict in America’s public sphere? In Seeking Good Debate, Michael S. Evans examines the results from the first-ever study to combine large-scale empirical analysis of some of our foremost religion and science debates with in-depth research into what Americans actually want in the public sphere. The surprising finding is that apparent conflicts involving religion and science reflect a more fundamental conflict between media elites and ordinary Americans over what is good debate. For elite representatives, good debate advances an agenda, but, as Evans shows, for many Americans it is defined by engagement and deliberation. This hidden conflict over what constitutes debate’s proper role diminishes the possibility for science and religion to be discussed meaningfully in public life. Challenging our understanding of science, religion, and conflict, Seeking Good Debate raises profound questions about the future of the public sphere and American democracy.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Rethinking Religion and Science
Human Origins and Stem Cell
Origins of Homosexuality
Representatives and Good Debate
Ordinary Americans and Good Debate
Religion and Bad Debate
Scientific Credibility in the Public Sphere
Other editions - View all
Al Gore bad debate Bush cell research debate Christian claims commitment deliberative debate discussion distinctively religious ence environmental policy evangelical Evans evolution example George W gion gious Haught human origins debate Intelligent Design interview issues James Dobson Jerry Falwell John Haught John Kerry mass media moderate religious moral agenda narrative negatively evaluated ordinary Americans ordinary persons origins of homosexuality participate in public Pat Robertson perspectives political politicians position problem prominent representatives public credibility public crusade public debate public sphere public talk questions recognized reli religion and science religion in public religion representatives religion talk religion topics religion-and-science debates religious credibility religious language Religious Right repre representa representatives in public résumé Richard Dawkins Robertson science and religion science in public science representatives science topics scientific credibility scientific research scientists in public simply specific statement stem cell research substantive suggested there’s tion tive topic map