Contemporary Art and the Digitization of Everyday LifeDigitization is the animating force of everyday life. Rather than defining it as a technology or a medium, Contemporary Art and the Digitization of Everyday Life argues that digitization is a socio-historical process that is contributing to the erosion of democracy and an increase in political inequality, specifically along racial, ethnic, and gender lines. Taking a historical approach, Janet Kraynak finds that the seeds of these developments are paradoxically related to the ideology of digital utopianism that emerged in the late 1960s with the rise of a social model of computing, a set of beliefs furthered by the neo-liberal tech ideology in the 1990s, and the popularization of networked computing. The result of this ongoing cultural worldview, which dovetails with the principles of progressive artistic strategies of the past, is a critical blindness in art historical discourse that ultimately compromises art's historically important role in furthering radical democratic aims. |
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Networked Centralities and Political | 39 |
Social Networks | 73 |
Racialization | 151 |
On Silence | 183 |
In Lieu of a Conclusion | 207 |
List of Illustrations | 269 |
Common terms and phrases
activities acts adds aesthetic affective argues artist artworks become bodies Border called capitalism central chapter cite collaborative collective comes concept connection contemporary context continues contrast critical cultural democracy describes developments discussion economy electronic emphasis engagement example exhibition existing experience figure forms future Gallery given global historical human ideas identity images individual installation institutions interaction issues Italy knowledge labor later live machines material means misogyny modes movements moving museum nature notes notion opening operate original Parreno participation particular past play political potentially practices Press production public sphere question race racial reading relation represents resistance result screen serves social social media society sound space story structures technologies theory things tion transformed turn University users writes York