Rousseau's Counter-Enlightenment: A Republican Critique of the Philosophes

Front Cover
State University of New York Press, Feb 1, 2012 - Philosophy - 206 pages
Arguing that the question of Jean-Jacques Rousseau's relationship to the Enlightenment has been eclipsed and seriously distorted by his association with the French Revolution, Graeme Garrard presents the first book-length case that shows Rousseau as the pivotal figure in the emergence of Counter-Enlightenment thought. Viewed in the context in which he actually lived and wrote—from the middle of the eighteenth century to his death in 1778—it is apparent that Rousseau categorically rejected the Enlightenment "republic of letters" in favor of his own "republic of virtue." The philosophes, placing faith in reason and natural human sociability and subjecting religion to systematic criticism and doubt, naively minimized the deep tensions and complexities of collective life and the power disintegrative forces posed to social order. Rousseau believed that the ever precarious social order could only be achieved artificially, by manufacturing "sentiments of sociability," reshaping individuals to identify with common interests instead of their own selfish interests.
 

Contents

Introduction
1
1 The Enlightenment Republic of Letters
11
The Many Faces of JeanJacques Rousseau
29
Rousseaus Critique of Enlightenment Social Thought
41
4 Rousseaus CounterEnlightenment Republic of Virtue
55
5 On the Utility of Religion
69
6 Dare to Be Ignorant
83
7 The Worst of All Possible Worlds
103
Conclusion
117
Notes
121
Bibliography
155
Index
179
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2012)

Graeme Garrard is Lecturer in Political Philosophy and European Thought at Cardiff University.

Bibliographic information