Passing Judgment: The Politics and Poetics of Sovereignty in French Tragedy from Hardy to Racine

Front Cover
University of Toronto Press, Jan 1, 2016 - Drama - 258 pages

The royal judge was an archetypal character in French tragedy during the 17th century. This figure impersonated the king by asserting his judicial authority and bringing order to an otherwise chaotic world.

In Passing Judgment, Hélène Bilis examines how an overlooked character-type--the royal judge--remained a constant of the tragic genre throughout the 17th century, although the specifics of his role and position fluctuated as playwrights experimented with changing models of sovereignty onstage. Her readings analyze how this royal decision-maker stood at the intersection of political and theatrical debates, and evolved through a process of trial and error in which certain portrayals of kingship were deemed obsolete and were discarded, while others were promoted as culturally allowable and resonant. In tracing the royal judge's persistent presence and transformation, Bilis argues that we can better grasp the weighty political stakes of theatrical representations under the ancien régime.

 

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Contents

Introduction
3
Richelieu Royal Judgment and the Rules
14
Alexandre Hardys Scédase ou lhospitalité violée
46
Tragedys Comedic Turn
72
On Corneille and Coherence
99
A Search for the Emperors Judgment
131
6 Racine and Royal Fathers of Injustice Mithridate and Phèdre
173
Conclusion
201
Notes
205
Bibliography
243
Index
255
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2016)

Hélène E. Bilis is an assistant professor in the Department of French at Wellesley College.

Bibliographic information