Jon Elster, Adam Przeworski
Cambridge University Press, Mar 28, 1998 - Political Science - 282 pages
It is sometimes assumed that voting is the central mechanism for political decision making. The contributors to this volume focus on an alternative mechanism, which is decision by discussion or deliberation. This volume is characterized by a realistic approach to the issue of deliberative democracy. Rather than assuming that deliberative democracy is always ideal, the authors critically probe its limits and weaknesses as well as its strengths.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
An Essay on Discursive Machismo
Deliberation as Discussion
Is Democracy Meaningless?
Deliberation and Constitution Making
Pathologies of Deliberation
Deliberation and Ideological Domination
Other editions - View all
Adam Przeworski advocates of deliberation agency aggregation ancillary risks arguing argument assembly Austen-Smith bargaining beliefs Bicameralism bill bounded rationality Cass Sunstein cheap-talk citizens claims Claro Cohen collective choice collective decision communication conflicting consider constitution culture debate defend deliberative conception deliberative democracy deliberative view democratic democratic deliberation effect elections Elster equal eration erences essay example expression full representation H. L. A. Hart Habermas Ibid idea impartial incentives individuals institutional interests issues John Rawls Jon Elster Joshua Cohen justify legislator Legitimacy liberty lobbyist majority Manin matters ment Mobil Oil moral NHTSA normative outcomes participants parties political deliberation Political Science preferences principle private information problem procedure proposal public discussion reasonable pluralism regulation relevant religious representatives requires result Riker self-interested sender simply Social Choice social choice theory society speech strategic Sunstein theory tion truth U.S. constitutional voters voting