Principles of Social Justice
Social justice has been the animating ideal of democratic governments throughout the twentieth century. Even those who oppose it recognize its potency. Yet the meaning of social justice remains obscure, and existing theories put forward by political philosophers to explain it have failed to capture the way people in general think about issues of social justice. This book develops a new theory. David Miller argues that principles of justice must be understood contextually, with each principle finding its natural home in a different form of human association. Because modern societies are complex, the theory of justice must be complex, too. The three primary components in Miller's scheme are the principles of desert, need, and equality. The book uses empirical research to demonstrate the central role played by these principles in popular conceptions of justice. It then offers a close analysis of each concept, defending principles of desert and need against a range of critical attacks, and exploring instances when justice requires equal distribution and when it does not. Finally, it argues that social justice understood in this way remains a viable political ideal even in a world characterized by economic globalization and political multiculturalism. Accessibly written, and drawing upon the resources of both political philosophy and the social sciences, this book will appeal to readers with interest in public policy as well as to students of politics, philosophy, and sociology.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Chapter 1 The Scope of Social Justice
Chapter 2 A Sketch of a Theory of Justice
Chapter 3 Social Science and Political Philosophy
What the People Think
Chapter 5 Procedures and Outcomes
Chapter 6 Virtues Practices and Justice
Chapter 7 The Concept of Desert
Chapter 8 Deserving Jobs
Other editions - View all
according achieve activities allocation appears apply argue argument basic basis beliefs benefits Cambridge candidate chap chapter citizens claim concept concern consider contrast contribution count criteria decide demands depend desert deserve discussion distribution economic effect equality evidence example existing extent fact fair favor give given greater grounds groups hold human idea income individuals inequalities injustice instance institutions issue judgments kind least less look matter means merit moral natural norms outcome Oxford particular people’s performance person political position possible practices preferences present principle principles of justice procedure productive qualities question Rawls reason receive relationship relevant requires responsible result rewards rules sense share simply social justice society someone suggested Suppose theory theory of justice tion treat understand University Press virtue